- Back
Threads [ Previous | Next ]
Trafficked RoR sites
Trafficked RoR sites bgs 6/28/08 11:26 AM
RE: Trafficked RoR sites palob 8/16/08 9:41 PM
RE: Trafficked RoR sites mouser 4/7/09 3:14 PM
RE: Trafficked RoR sites palob 4/8/09 1:05 PM
Trafficked RoR sites | 6/28/08 11:26 AM
If you know of any RoR based sites with serious traffic, list them here with URL. If you know the traffic stats, also include that.
RE: Trafficked RoR sites | 8/16/08 9:41 PM as a reply to bgs.
This says something about RoR sites/traffic, but I do not use them personally so I cannot confirm how it works.
http://blog.evanweaver.com/articles/2008/05/27/is-twitter-still-the-biggest-rails-site/
RE: Trafficked RoR sites | 4/7/09 3:14 PM as a reply to palob.
Well, I don't want to dissappoint RoR lovers, but makers of Twitter switched to Scala recently:

http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/editors/23282/?nlid=1908

Seems that (simply put) RoR was not able to handle so much traffic.

A little off-topic, but Alex Payne, a guy behind Twitter API writes a book called (heh ;)) "Programming Scala". It will be published by O'Reilly, rough cuts are available here: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596157746/

There is also another new Scala book coming written by David Pollak -- the author of Lift framework, it's called "Beginning Scala" (http://www.apress.com/book/view/9781430219897). And why am I mentioning this here? David Pollak has been consulting for Twitter.
RE: Trafficked RoR sites | 4/8/09 1:05 PM as a reply to mouser.
Hmm,
The user interface runs on Ruby on Rails, which is "fine for people clicking around Web pages," he says. But by the end of the year, Twitter hopes to have a set of services in the back end that are written entirely in Scala.

So they cannot be sure how it will turn out yet . But if their problems were with scalability, then I believe they can succeed with Scala, because threading in Ruby is not very good.

This article misses one point mentioned in many blogs. They needed to introduce type system in application. And that might mean they used Ruby incorrectly as they thrown away the Ruby's strongest point.

I have checked out Lift before and I have to confess I do not understand it. It is completely reverted logic. But I would like study it later if time allows.